Dean v. Sheriff, Smith County
Petitioner: Horace Grely Dean, III
Respondent: Sheriff, Smith County
Case Number: 6:2021cv00368
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 s
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 Letter from Horace Grely Dean, III. (wea, )
October 27, 2021 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Smith County Sheriff Larry R. Smith as to #4 Order to Show Cause - Habeas Petition - State, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Received 10/25/2021)(wea, )
October 27, 2021 Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Smith County Dist. Atty. Jacob Putnam as to #4 Order to Show Cause - Habeas Petition - State, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.(wea, )
October 22, 2021 Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Horace Grely Dean, III as to #3 Order of Deficiency; RECEIVED 10-14-2021. (mll, )
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - HABEAS PETITION - STATE. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondent shall have 60 days in which to show cause why the writ should not be granted or to otherwise plead. Copy of the petition and this order to Smith County Sheriff Larry R. Smith and Smith County District Attorney Jacob Putnam via certified mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 10/20/2021. (wea, )
October 18, 2021 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-58456 (mll, )
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER of deficiency re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Horace Grely Dean, III. Petitioner has thirty days from receipt of this Order to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a properly supported application to proceed IFP. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/22/2021. (gsg)
September 21, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to petitioner. (mll, )
September 20, 2021 Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K Nicole Mitchell. (mll, )
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Horace Grely Dean, III.(mll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dean v. Sheriff, Smith County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Horace Grely Dean, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sheriff, Smith County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?