Rosilez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Dylan Rosilez |
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 6:2022cv00316 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| John D Love |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Dylan Rosilez as to #6 Order, 1983 and 2241 forms. Received 9/6/22. (ndc) |
| Filing fee received: $ 5, receipt number 6-61713 (gsm) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO AMEND. Petitioner is hereby ORDERED to file an amended pleading within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty (30) days from receipt of this Order to pay the filing fee applicable to the type of pleading he chooses to file or to submit a properly supported application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/29/2022. (wea, )
|
| Filing 5 OBJECTION TO SEVERANCE by Dylan Rosilez re #3 Order,, (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope(s))(jbe, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SEVER AND TRANSFER. Petitioner's claims concerning the conditions of confinement in the Michael Unit shall remain pending in this case. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Section 2254 challenge to the validity of the Fort Bend County court judgment is SEVERED from the remainder of this case. The Clerk of Court shall ISSUE a separate cause number for Petitioner's Section 2254 claims. Finally, it is ORDERED that the newly-created Section 2254 case is TRANSFERRED to the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas. The Clerk of Court shall transfer the new case forthwith and without delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/15/2022. (wea, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent form to Petitioner. (wea, ) |
| Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (wea, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Dylan Rosilez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B, #2 Memorandum, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope(s))(wea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rosilez v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dylan Rosilez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
