Ha et al v. Nguyen
Johnny Ha, Jenny Ha and Jenny Pham |
Denise Britt Nguyen |
6:2022cv00462 |
December 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
J Campbell Barker |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #7 First MOTION to Set Aside Default Clerk Entry filed by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Johnny Ha)(Stinson, Andrew) |
Filing 9 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #7 First MOTION to Set Aside Default Clerk Entry Defendant filed by Denise Britt Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Hughey, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/27/2023: #2 Attach. A, #3 Attach. B) (wea, ). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 First MOTION to Set Aside Default Clerk Entry filed by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Johnny Ha, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Stinson, Andrew) |
Filing 7 First MOTION to Set Aside Default Clerk Entry by Denise Britt Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Def Declaration, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Hughey, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/17/2023: #3 Text of Corrected Proposed Order) (wea, ). |
Filing 6 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Denise Britt Nguyen. (wea, ) |
Filing 5 Request by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham for Clerk's Entry of Default against Denise Britt Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of A. Stinson, #2 Proposed Clerk's Entry of Default)(Stinson, Andrew) |
Filing 4 ***DEFICIENT FILING. PLEASE DISREGARD.*** MOTION for Entry of Default /Application for Entry of Default Against Defendant Denise Britt by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of A. Stinson, #2 Proposed Clerk's Entry of Default)(Stinson, Andrew). |
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the Motion for Entry of Default, Entry #4 submitted by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham. Incorrect docketing event for attached Request for Entry of Default.(wea, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham. Denise Britt Nguyen served on 12/7/2022, answer due 12/28/2022. (Stinson, Andrew) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (wea, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Johnny Ha, Jenny Pham. (wea, ) |
District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (wea, ) |
COURT ORDER: The court adopts in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his page on the court's website and may be updated without separate docket entry. All parties and counsel are ordered to stay abreast of the current standing orders and to comply with those orders and with the court's local rules. Noncompliance with those standing orders or local rules may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (wea, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Denise Britt Nguyen. (ndc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Denise Britt Nguyen ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9256978.), filed by Johnny Ha, Jenny Ha. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stinson, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.