Crumbley v. Dawson et al
| Frederick Jerome Crumbley |
| Gregory Dawson, Michael A Roesler, Frank Helem, Glenn Hopson, Connely Moore, Unidentified Gilchrest and Natalie Hadnot |
| 9:2009cv00014 |
| January 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Tyler |
| Ron Clark |
| Judith K. Guthrie |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION on the 79 Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Sherly Meador. All of the plaintiff's claims against Meador are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. It is ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and any and all pending motions in this case are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 2/18/11. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION on the 68 Motion for Summary Judgment by defendants Hopson, Moore, and Helm. The Motion for Summary Judgement is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the claims against defendants Hopson, Moore, and Helm are DISMISSED with prejudice, an d these individuals are dismissed as parties to this suit. The dismissal of these claims and parties will have no effect on the plaintiff's claims against defendant Sherly Meador. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 2/17/11. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL dismissing with prejudice as frivolous claims against Brad Livingston, Warden Roesler, Warden Dawson, Officer Gilchriest, and Captain McFarland. Claims against Natalie Hadnot are dismissed with prejud ice on the motion of Plaintiff. These Defendants are dismissed as parties to the lawsuit, but this dismissal has no effect upon remaining claims and parties in the case. This dismissal shall not count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 5/28/10. (mjc, )
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Partial Order of dismissal that the pla's claims concerning the disciplinary case which he received for allegedly possessing a weapon on 4/10/07 which case was overturned on appeal and the subsequent denials of parole base d upon this disciplinary case, are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to their reassertion through the vehicle of a habeas corpus petition. FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs claims concerning the calculation of his time credits is likewise DISMISS ED without prejudice to their being brought through the vehicle of a habeas corpus petition. The dismissal of these claims shall have no effect upon theclaims raised in the amended complaint filed on June 26, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 8/4/09. (djh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
