Coleman v. Sweetin et al
Freddie R Coleman |
David Sweetin, Gregory Oliver, Richard Cowan, Roy Brown, Shelia Dale, Mae Cobbs, Debbie Erwin, Craig Fisher, Blake Lamb, Unknown McManus and Brenda Hough |
9:2010cv00135 |
September 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Lufkin Office |
Anderson |
Ron Clark |
Judith K. Guthrie |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' motion to dismiss for want of prosecution 88 is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 2/2/15. (ljw, ) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Cheryl McManus are DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to obey an order. The statute of limitations for the Plaintiff's claim against Defendant McManus is suspended for thirty days from the entry of this order. The complaint is dismissed and all pending motions are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 11/28/11. (ljw, ) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER of Partial Dismissal. Plaintiff may proceed with his deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against P. A. McManus. The remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 5/12/11. (ljw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.