Jackson v. Eastham Ad Seg Administration et al
David Maurice Jackson |
Simon D Edozie, Eastham Ad Seg Administration, Christopher A Farrell, Yetunde Adenifesi and Maina Dworsky |
9:2018cv00142 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Lufkin Office |
Angelina |
Ron Clark |
Keith F Giblin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER that plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time through, and including, October 15, 2018, in which to pay the initial partial filing fee of $13.02. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 9/25/18. (ljw, ) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to #3 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee filed by David Maurice Jackson. (ljw, ) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by David Maurice Jackson on 8/22/18 as to #3 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee. (ljw, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $13.02 within 30 days for David Maurice Jackson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 8/15/18. (ljw, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Maurice Jackson. (ljw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights) against All Defendants, filed by David Maurice Jackson.(ljw, ) |
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin (ljw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.