McKay v. Berryhill

McKay v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Michelle McKay
Defendant:	Nancy Berryhill
Case Number:	1:2017cv00184
Filed:	December 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Abilene Office
County:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	E. Scott Frost
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 402
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 23, 2019	Filing 20 ORDER. Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge advising that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed and that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed. Plaintiff timel y filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations on January 22, 2019. Having considered Plaintiff's objections, the Court is of the opinion that they should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in this Report and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court, that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and that the above-styled and numbered cause is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/23/2019) (jmc)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 23, 2019

Filing 20 ORDER. Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge advising that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed and that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed. Plaintiff timel y filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations on January 22, 2019. Having considered Plaintiff's objections, the Court is of the opinion that they should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in this Report and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court, that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and that the above-styled and numbered cause is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/23/2019) (jmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKay v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle McKay
Represented By:	Steven R Scoggin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?