Hays v. Warden

Petitioner: Larry Steve Hays
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 1:2019cv00037
Filed: March 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 4. Fri Mar 22 14:10:03 CDT 2019 (crt)
March 22, 2019 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jak)
March 22, 2019 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Larry Steve Hays. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jak)
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Petitioner filed a "Pro-Se Request to be Provided with 'Jail Credit' Time as per Provided by the PSI/PSR to Correct Error in Sentence Calculation by FBOP (all sic)" in 1:13-CR-006-C-BL. The Court liberally construes the request as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and finds that Defendant should file an amended petition using the form provided by the Clerk. It is ORDERED that: (1) Defendant's "Pro-Se Request to be Provided with 'Jail Credit Time' as per Provided by the PSI/PSR to Correct Error in Sentence Calculation by FBOP (all sic) is construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241; (2) The Clerk is directed to open a new 2241 action styled Larry Steve Hays v. Warden, FCI Big Spring and docket this Order and Defendant's March 21 motion in the new habeas action; (3) Defendant must, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order: (a) file an amended petition using the 2241 form provided by the Clerk; AND (b) pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of his inmate trust account; (4) The Clerk shall mail to Defendant a 2241 form, application to proceed in forma pauperis, and certificate of inmate trust account marked with the Civil Action number assigned to the new 2241 action for his use in complying with this Order. (5) Failure to comply with this Order may lead to the dismissal of the 2241 action for failure to prosecute. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/22/2019) (Attachments: #1 Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Application for IFP) (jak)
March 22, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hays v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry Steve Hays
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?