Avalos v. USA
| Pascual Jaime Avalos |
| USA |
| 1:2020cv00173 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Amy J Mitchell-DOJ added as AUSA. (Mitchell-DOJ, Amy) |
Filing 5
Order and Instructions to Parties in a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255: The United States attorney shall, within 60 days from the date of this order, file an answer, motion or other response to the motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion, the Court's August 24, 2020 Order to Show Cause, and Avalos's Response to that order and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/9/2020) (jak)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Sep 9 14:19:15 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Movant's Reply to Court's Order to Show Cause filed by Pascual Jaime Avalos, re: #3 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (jak) |
|
Filing 3
Order to Show Cause: After preliminary review, the Court notes that it appears that the motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is subject to summary dismissal as barred by the time limitation for filing such motions. It is therefore ORDERED that Pascual Jaime Avalos shall, by no later than September 24, 2020, file a response reciting any arguments as to why his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 should not be dismissed as filed beyond the time allowed. Failure to timely respond to this order by September 24, 2020 could result in the summary dismissal of the 2255 motion without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/24/2020) (jak)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Mon Aug 24 14:48:39 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Judge Reed C. O'Connor added. Senior Judge Sam R Cummings no longer assigned to case. (jmc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate filed by Pascual Jaime Avalos. ***(Clerk's Note: Page 9 of the Factual Resume was not included in the filing.) (jmc) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (jmc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Mon Aug 17 16:48:09 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Avalos v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
| Represented By: | Amy J Mitchell-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Pascual Jaime Avalos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
