Davis v. Liberty Insurance Corporation
Cindy Davis |
Liberty Insurance Corporation |
1:2024cv00175 |
October 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
John R Parker |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO ABATE. For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion and ORDERS that the above-styled and numbered case is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending further order of the Court. To ensure that this stay is not of immoderate or indefinite duration, the parties are ORDERED to file a status report on the appraisal no later than May 20, 2025. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 11/20/2024) (amg) |
Filing 9 ORDER. The Court refers this case to the Honorable Magistrate Judge John R. Parker for pretrial management pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(A). The Magistrate Judge is to notify the Court when the case is ready for a trial setting. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/19/2024) (ada) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Abate Pending Completion of Agreed Appraisal filed by Liberty Insurance Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Agreed Motion to Abate Pending Completion of Agreed Appraisal) (Batchelor, Colin) |
Filing 7 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER. Lead counsel for each party (or a designee attorney with appropriate authority) and any unrepresented party (except for a prisoner litigant proceeding pro se) shall confer at a scheduling conference as soon as practicable, but in any event no later than November 27, 2024. During the scheduling conference, the parties shall consider the nature and basis for their claims and defenses; the possibilities for a prompt resolution of the case; arrangements for the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1); and preparation of the report described within. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before December 11, 2024. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/15/2024) (skh) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cindy Davis. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Russo, Matthew) |
Filing 5 ORDER. Before the Court is the plantiff's unopposed motion to waive the local counsel requirements set forth in Local Civil Rule 83.10. Dk. No. #4 . For the reasons stated in the motion, the motion is granted. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/18/2024) (skh) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Cindy Davis (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Russo, Matthew) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (skh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Batchelor, Colin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14985413) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Nolan County Civil Case Information Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Index of all documents filed in the state court action, #3 Exhibit(s) B-1: Plaintiffs Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) B-2: Citation to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, #5 Exhibit(s) B-3: Affidavit of Service on Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, #6 Exhibit(s) B-4: Plaintiffs First Amended Petition, #7 Exhibit(s) B-5: Liberty Insurance Corporations Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Petition, #8 Exhibit(s) C: Nolan County Appraisal Districts listing identifying Plaintiff as the owner of the subject Property and the Propertys deed, #9 Exhibit(s) D: Plaintiffs Pre-suit Demand, #10 Cover Sheet, #11 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Batchelor, Colin) (Attachment 11 replaced with flattened version on 10/11/2024) (skh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davis v. Liberty Insurance Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cindy Davis | |
Represented By: | Matthew Stephen Russo |
Represented By: | Shaun W Hodge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Liberty Insurance Corporation | |
Represented By: | Johali Mulibinge Muzaliwa |
Represented By: | Colin R Batchelor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.