Ortiz v. Quarterman et al
| Marcos Ortiz |
| N Quarterman, M Sizemore and Northwest Texas Hospital |
| 2:2008cv00172 |
| September 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER Denying Pauper Status and ORDER of Dismissal. Overruling plaintiff's objections and Adopting 7 Report and Recommendation. Ordered that plaintiff's request to proceed ifp is denied and the Civil Rights Complaint is Dismissed Without Prejudice to Refiling With Prepayment of the Filing Fee. 28 USC 1915(g) (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 11/21/08) (djs)
|
|
Filing
7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS: Because pltf has already sustained the "three strikes" and can no longer avail himself of the provisions for proceeding IFP, it is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to the U.S. District Judge t hat pltf's request to proceed IFP be denied and that the instant cause be dismissed for failure to pay the requisite filing fee. Pltf is advised that if he pays the $350.00 filing fee within 14 days after the filing date hereof, this R&R of dismissal will be withdrawn. Any objections must be filed on or before the 14th day after this recommendation is filed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 10/23/08) (jeh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
