Doster v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| Brandon Dale Doster |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 2:2018cv00174 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/22/2018) (vls)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Oct 22 11:14:59 CDT 2018 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TEMPORARILY GRANTING PERMISSION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PENDING SUPPLEMENTATION - Petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order in which to submit the request and data sheet, pay the filing fee, or submit evidence that petitioner has authorized the institution to disburse the requisite funds from his trust account by properly completing and submitting to the institution a Form I-25 entitled "Inmate Request for Withdrawal." (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/18/2018) (vls)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Sep 18 14:46:04 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of 1st page of petition also mailed) Tue Sep 18 10:32:21 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Brandon Dale Doster re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (vls) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brandon Dale Doster. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (vls) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (vls) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (vls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doster v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brandon Dale Doster | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
