Holleman v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Darrell Lynn Holleman |
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
2:2019cv00144 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Matthew J Kacsmaryk |
Lee Ann Reno |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE by Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID re: #7 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion. (nhp) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES. Respondent is directed to answer this petition within 70 days after entry of this Order. The clerk will electronically serve this order, the petition, and supporting documents to the designee for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 7/18/2019) (nhp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Jul 18 13:38:43 CDT 2019 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Jul 18 08:05:37 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting Petitioner's #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 7/17/2019) (Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Darrell Lynn Holleman. (awc) |
Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Darrell Lynn Holleman re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (awc) |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Darrell Lynn Holleman. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (awc) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. (Copy of first page of file-marked petition also mailed to petitioner.) Tue Jul 16 13:51:20 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Holleman v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Darrell Lynn Holleman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.