Gomez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| Rolando Gomez and Roland Jesus Gomez |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 2:2019cv00170 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objection. Objections to F&R are now due by 11/1/2019 (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 9/30/2019) (daa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Mon Sep 30 11:41:38 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objection filed by Rolando Gomez (daa) |
|
Filing 9
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS on Case re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Rolando Gomez. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/6/2019) (daa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Sep 6 10:57:52 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Fri Sep 6 13:54:53 CDT 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting Petitioner's #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/5/2019) (Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Rolando Gomez (daa) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rolando Gomez. (daa) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SUBMIT FORM PETITION: Petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days fromthe filing date of this Order to submit a properly completed petition. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 8/21/2019) (Attachments: #1 Amended 2254 Form) (awc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TEMPORARILY GRANTING PERMISSION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PENDING SUPPLEMENTATION: Petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order in which to submit the request and data sheet, pay the filing fee, or submit evidence that petitioner has authorized the institution to disburse the requisite funds from his trust account. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 8/21/2019) (awc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Wed Aug 21 15:25:04 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. (Copy of first page of file-marked petition also mailed to petitioner.) Tue Aug 20 10:52:00 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rolando Gomez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (awc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
