Mayo Marrs Casing Pulling, Inc. v. P&K Equipment, Inc. et al
2:2020cv00057 |
August 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Amarillo Office |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . The Court DEFERS ruling on Xzeres Holdings' Motion (ECF No. 28) and ORDERS Plaintiff to file a proposed discovery order that details the specifi c, narrowly tailored discovery requested-i.e., interrogatories and/or depositions on identified persons, requests for production, etc.,-that is no more burdensome than necessary on or before August 10, 2020. It is further ORDERED that Xzeres Holdings shall file a response to Plaintiff's proposed discovery order and state that it either (1) agrees to each request or (2) objects to the request, in good faith, detailing its justification for such objection on or before August 17, 2020. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 8/4/2020) (awc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mayo Marrs Casing Pulling, Inc. v. P&K Equipment, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.