Jackson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Jarvis Jackson
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 2:2020cv00147
Filed: May 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Matthew J Kacsmaryk
Referring Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2020 Case copied to 3:20cv1421-X. Transfer to Dallas Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (ldm)
June 3, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Wed Jun 3 12:52:35 CDT 2020 (crt)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 6/3/2020) (daa)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Petitioner has tendered to the federal court system a pleading addressed to the "Texas Court of Appeals," captioned "Ex parte Jarvis Jackson," and titled "Notice of Appeal." [ECF 3]. Petitioner's pleading has been construed as an attempt to initiate a federal habeas corpus proceeding challenging the constitutionality of his underlying state court conviction. Petitioner has not, however, submitted with his pleading any payment to satisfy the requisite filing fee, nor has he submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified in forma pauperis data sheet from the institution in which he is confined. However, as this case is being transferred to another division in the Northern District of Texas, no ruling will be entered with regard to these deficiencies. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 6/3/2020) (daa)
June 2, 2020 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Copy of first page (Dkt. 3) included in mailing. Tue Jun 2 11:59:29 CDT 2020 (crt)
May 29, 2020 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jarvis Jackson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (daa)
May 29, 2020 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (daa)
May 29, 2020 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (daa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jarvis Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?