Wall et al v. Vista Hospice Care Inc
| Misty Wall, State of Indiana, State of Massachusetts, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Texas and United States of America |
| Vista Hospice Care Inc, Vistacare Inc and Odyssey Healthcare Inc |
| 3:2007cv00604 |
| April 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
431
Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying 420 Motion for Reconsideration. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 11/14/2017) (ams)
|
|
Filing
408
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket Entry # 235 ], Motion to Strike the Testimony of Dr. Kriegler [Docket Entry # 229 ], and Motion to Strike the Testimony of Dr. Karl Steinberg [Doc ket Entry # 232 ], as well as Relator's Motion to Strike the Opinion of Dr. Michael Salve [Docket Entry # 246 ], Motion to Strike the Opinions of Drs. Bull and Hughes [Docket Entry # 249 ], and Motion to Exclude Witnesses Pursuant to Rule 37(c)( 1) [Docket Entry # 254 ]. The Court held a hearing on the Motions on 5/6/2016. For the reasons stated on the record and in this Opinion, the Defendants' Motions to Strike the Testimony of Drs. Kriegler and Steinberg are GRANTED in part, the Defe ndants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Relator's Motions are DENIED as moot. Defendants also filed objections to Relator's summary judgment evidence [Docket Entry # 336 ]. To the extent the objections are not addressed below, they are DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/20/2016) (bdb)
|
|
Filing
361
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the Court is Relator Misty Wall's Motion for Leave to Amend the Scheduling Order, to Amend the Complaint, and for Relief from the Court's Prior Order [Docket Entry # 248 ]. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/28/2016) (sss)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting 40 Motion/Request for Judicial Notice; granting 47 Motion/Request for Judicial Notice. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudic e as to Counts Three, Five, Six, and Eleven; GRANTED without prejudice as to Counts One, Two, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, and Twelve; and DENIED as to Count Four. Relator may amend her Complaint in accordance with this Opinion on or before twenty-eight days from the date of this Opinion. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/9/2011) (skt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
