Dr Bradley-Brown v. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc

Plaintiff: Dr Bradley-Brown
Defendant: American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
Case Number: 3:2012cv00285
Filed: January 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Presiding Judge: Jorge A Solis
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dr Bradley-Brown v. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr Bradley-Brown
Represented By: Edward W Ciolko
Represented By: Jeffrey J Angelovich
Represented By: Michelle A Coccagna
Represented By: Daniel Lawrence Germain
Represented By: Christopher Robert Johnson
Represented By: Donna Siegel Moffa
Represented By: Terence S Ziegler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
Represented By: Kelly S Biggins
Represented By: Elizabeth K Duffy
Represented By: Robert T Mowrey
Represented By: Conrad V Sison
Represented By: Thomas G Yoxall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?