Jones v. The Housing Authority of the City of Dallas, Texas
Plaintiff:
Doris Fay Jones
Defendant:
The Housing Authority of the City of Dallas, Texas
Case Number:
3:2013cv00612
Filed:
February 6, 2013
Court:
Texas Northern District Court
Office:
Dallas Office
County:
Dallas
Presiding Judge:
Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. The Housing Authority of the City of Dallas, Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Doris Fay Jones | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J Stutz |
| Represented By: | Ericka S Hightower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Housing Authority of the City of Dallas, Texas | |
| Represented By: | Gerald V Bright |
| Represented By: | David L Craft |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.