Robertson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 30, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Petitioner Mark Robertson's 47 application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. In accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and after considering the record in t his case, the court DENIES Robertson a certificate of appealability because he has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). If Robertson files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/30/2017) (twd)
|August 28, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 20 MOTION for Reconsideration. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/28/2013) (tln)
|June 13, 2013
Memorandum Opinion and Order re: 8 MOTION to Seal and Consider Application for Funding Ex parte (Opposed), 10 MOTION to Seal and Consider Application for Funding Ex parte (Opposed). The court finds that petitioner has not made a proper showing concerning the need for confidentiality. Petitioner may either supplement his motions for leave to proceed ex parte with the information listed above within 21 days of this order, or he may serve the applications upon respo ndent that were previously tendered ex parte. Respondent is allowed 14 days from the date that any supplemented motion for leave to proceed ex parte or re-filed application is filed to make his response. Extensions of time may be granted for good cause shown. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/13/2013) (cea)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?