Geiken v. Worku
Plaintiff: Chad Geiken
Defendant: Anteneh Tesfaye Worku
Case Number: 3:2015cv02442
Filed: July 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. While Default Judgment is appropriate, the evidence before the Court is insufficient to award damages that can be determined through mathematical calculation. Therefore, Plaintiff may supplement the record with additional evidence on or before Friday, 6/2/2017. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/2/2017) (axm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geiken v. Worku
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Geiken
Represented By: Kelly M Crawford
Represented By: James Stafford, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anteneh Tesfaye Worku
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?