Mead v. Lattimore Materials Company et al
Clinton Mead |
Lattimore Materials Company and Holcim Lafarge |
3:2016cv00791 |
March 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2615 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 87 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, for a New Trial, to Alter or Amend the Judgment, and for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/27/2018) (zkc) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court denies Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 47 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/14/2018) (sss) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25 ). Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted with respect to Mead's claim of interference under the FM LA and for disability discrimination under the Texas Labor Code. As Mead has failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to these claims, they are hereby dismissed with prejudice. As genuine disputes of material fact remain for trial with r espect to Mead's FMLA discrimination and retaliation claims, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as to these claims. The court will reset the trial of this case and pretrial deadlines by separate order. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/9/2018) (sss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.