Mead v. Lattimore Materials Company et al
Plaintiff: Clinton Mead
Defendant: Lattimore Materials Company and Holcim Lafarge
Case Number: 3:2016cv00791
Filed: March 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2615
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 87 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, for a New Trial, to Alter or Amend the Judgment, and for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/27/2018) (zkc)
June 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court denies Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 47 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/14/2018) (sss)
February 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25 ). Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted with respect to Mead's claim of interference under the FM LA and for disability discrimination under the Texas Labor Code. As Mead has failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to these claims, they are hereby dismissed with prejudice. As genuine disputes of material fact remain for trial with r espect to Mead's FMLA discrimination and retaliation claims, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as to these claims. The court will reset the trial of this case and pretrial deadlines by separate order. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/9/2018) (sss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mead v. Lattimore Materials Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lattimore Materials Company
Represented By: Brett Cornwell
Represented By: Matthew A Nowak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holcim Lafarge
Represented By: Brett Cornwell
Represented By: Matthew A Nowak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clinton Mead
Represented By: W D Masterson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?