Koncak et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust et al
James D Koncak and Judi K Koncak |
Deutsche Bank National Trust and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC |
3:2016cv01507 |
June 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 Order: re: 30 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File filed by James D Koncak. The court, therefore, grants Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal Pursuant to Federal Rule 4(a)(5) (Doc. 26). Before the court could rule on Plaintiffs' motion and the Report, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal on June 6, 2017, after the magistrate judge recommended that their motion be granted. Accordingl y, in light of the courts ruling on Plaintiffs' motion, it extends Plaintiffs' deadline to appeal under Fed. R. App. 4(b)(5) to June 6, 2017, such that their Notice of Appeal filed June 6, 2017, is deemed timely. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/9/2017) (ndt) |
Filing 24 Order Accepting 21 Findings and Recommendations. The court overrules the Plaintiffs' objections, grants 13 Motion to Dismiss, and denies 16 Motion for Leave to File. This action is dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/8/2017) (epm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.