Brewer v. United States Department of Justice et al
Steven Brewer |
United States Department of Justice and National Personnel Records Center |
3:2018cv01018 |
April 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Jane J. Boyle |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER ACCEPTING 57 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Defendants' 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff's 49 Combined Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgement and Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/21/2019) (mla) |
Filing 42 Order Accepting 41 Findings and Recommendations re: 13 Motion to Substitute Party filed by National Personnel Records Center is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 12/18/2018) (ndt) |
Filing 39 Memorandum Opinion and Order re: 23 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Brief in Support. Defendants' motion for protective order is GRANTED, and discovery is stayed until after summary judgment motions have been filed. The scheduling order dated 6/26/2018 is hereby VACATED. Defendants shall file their motions for summary judgment within 30 days of the date of this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/20/2018) (mcrd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.