Jones v. Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General
Jason P. Jones |
Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General |
3:2018cv01793 |
July 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
David C Godbey |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Torts/Pers Prop: Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mcrd/ala) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mcrd/ala) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General. (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Justice Court, Precinct 3, Place 1, Dallas County, Texas, case number JS18-00680A filed by Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Index of State Court Records, #2 State Court Record: Small Claims Petition, #3 State Court Record: Inability to Pay Affidavit, #4 State Court Record: Citation, #5 Cover Sheet, #6 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Thu Jul 12 11:06:01 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jason P. Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General | |
Represented By: | Brian Walters Stoltz-DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.