Everett Financial Inc v. Kocher
Plaintiff: Everett Financial, Inc. and Everett Financial Inc
Defendant: John E. Kocher and John E Kocher
Case Number: 3:2018cv01858
Filed: July 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION to Strike #11 Appendix in Support and Objections to filed by Everett Financial Inc (Hill, Kristopher)
September 12, 2018 Filing 13 REPLY filed by Everett Financial Inc re: #6 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT (Hill, Kristopher)
August 29, 2018 Filing 12 Supplemental Document by Everett Financial Inc as to #6 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT . (Hill, Kristopher)
August 29, 2018 Filing 11 Appendix in Support filed by John E Kocher re #10 Response/Objection to P's Motion to Remand (Clark, Steven)
August 29, 2018 Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by John E Kocher re: #6 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT (Clark, Steven)
August 15, 2018 Filing 9 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal Corrected Notice of Removal by Defendant John E Kocher. (Clark, Steven) Modified Docket Text on 8/16/2018 (ajb).
August 9, 2018 Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by John E Kocher. (Clark, Steven)
August 8, 2018 Filing 7 Appendix in Support filed by Everett Financial Inc re #6 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT (Hill, Kristopher)
August 8, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Everett Financial Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Hill, Kristopher)
July 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/26/2018) (axm)
July 25, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by John E. Kocher. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Clark, Steven)
July 18, 2018 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc)
July 18, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by John E. Kocher. (Clark, Steven)
July 18, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 298th District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-18-08482 filed by John E. Kocher. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9325334) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet) (Clark, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Everett Financial Inc v. Kocher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Kocher
Represented By: Steven E Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E Kocher
Represented By: Steven E Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Everett Financial, Inc.
Represented By: Kristopher Dennis Hill
Represented By: Michael L Rice
Represented By: Mikel Bowers
Represented By: Katie J Colopy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Everett Financial Inc
Represented By: Kristopher Dennis Hill
Represented By: Michael L Rice
Represented By: Mikel Bowers
Represented By: Katie J Colopy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?