Sharpless v. Ark Hope Cook
| Dennis Clay Sharpless |
| Ark Hope Cook |
| 3:2018cv02241 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint or Assign Department of Justice to Take Over Matter filed by Dennis Clay Sharpless. (zkc) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTION filed by Dennis Clay Sharpless re: #4 Order. (zkc) |
Filing 4
Order Administratively Closing Case: The plaintiff is still subject to, but has not shown that he has complied with, the sanctions orders in Cause No. 3:13-CV-2297-D and Cause No. 3:13-CV-2786-P. Accordingly, the Clerk's Office shall file a copy of the sanctions orders in Cause No. 3:13-CV-2297-D and Cause No. 3:13-CV-2786-P in this case. Based on the prior sanctions orders, the plaintiff may not re-file his complaint in this case without paying the entire filing fee, demonstrating that he has satisfied all outstanding monetary sanctions against him, and obtaining judicial permission. Any pending and future motions filed in this action shall be docketed for administrative purposes only and terminated. No action will be taken on those filings while this action remains closed pursuant to the sanctions order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/27/2018) (Attachments: #1 Sanction Order 3:13-cv-2297, #2 Sanction Order 3:13-cv-2786) (zkc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 4. Mon Aug 27 09:18:56 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dennis Clay Sharpless. (mcrd/ala) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/27/2018 due to upside down pages) (svc). Modified on 8/27/2018 (svc). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Ark Hope Cook filed by Dennis Clay Sharpless. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mcrd/ala) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (mcrd/ala) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sharpless v. Ark Hope Cook | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dennis Clay Sharpless | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ark Hope Cook | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
