Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Blackberry Corporation
Plaintiff: Uniloc 2017 LLC
Defendant: Blackberry Corporation
Case Number: 3:2018cv03069
Filed: November 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting #34 Motion to Stay. This action is STAYED pending the issuance of a Final Written Decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in IPR2019-00222 and 2019-00252. Within seven days from the issuance of such a decision, the parties shall file a joint notice advising the Court of the decision. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 6/25/2019) (rekc)
June 18, 2019 Filing 34 Joint MOTION to Stay filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jacobs, Aaron)
May 28, 2019 Filing 33 NOTICE of Compliance with Local Patent Rule 4-2 filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt)
May 21, 2019 Filing 32 NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Amended Initial Disclosures filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt)
May 16, 2019 Filing 31 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt)
May 16, 2019 Filing 30 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt)
May 16, 2019 Filing 29 REPLY filed by Blackberry Corporation re: #26 MOTION for Protective Order BlackBerry's Opposed Motion for Entry of Protective Order (Pankratz, Kurt)
May 2, 2019 Filing 28 OBJECTION filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC re: #26 MOTION for Protective Order BlackBerry's Opposed Motion for Entry of Protective Order (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jacobs, Aaron)
April 24, 2019 Filing 27 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt)
April 12, 2019 Filing 26 MOTION for Protective Order BlackBerry's Opposed Motion for Entry of Protective Order filed by Blackberry Corporation (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D) (Pankratz, Kurt)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #24 Motion to Extend Time. The deadline for Defendant to serve its preliminary invalidity contentions according Misc. Order 62 3-3 and the deadline for Defendant to produce or make available such documents accompanying the preliminary invalidity contentions according to Misc. Order 62 3-4 is hereby extended to and including April 22, 2019. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/28/2019) (chmb)
March 25, 2019 Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to Serve Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Document Production filed by Blackberry Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pankratz, Kurt)
March 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATED ORDER GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/4/2019) (rekc)
February 28, 2019 Filing 22 Agreed MOTION for Entry of ESI Order by Uniloc 2017 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jacobs, Aaron) Modified to add motion event on 3/1/2019 (zkc).
February 28, 2019 Filing 21 Agreed MOTION for Protective Order filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jacobs, Aaron)
February 28, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of COMPLIANCE REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt)
February 20, 2019 Filing 19 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC. Related document: #16 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim (Gannon, Kevin)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SCHEDULING ORDER (PATENT) (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/19/2019) (ykp)
February 7, 2019 Filing 17 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order [JOINT CMCS] by Uniloc 2017 LLC. (Gannon, Kevin)
January 30, 2019 Filing 16 DEFENDANT BLACKBERRY CORPORATIONS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ANSWER to #14 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Blackberry Corporation. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. First COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT BLACKBERRY CORPORATIONS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Uniloc 2017 LLC filed by Blackberry Corporation (Pankratz, Kurt).
January 16, 2019 Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss BLACKBERRY'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT (Gannon, Kevin)
January 16, 2019 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Blackberry Corporation filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Gannon, Kevin)
January 15, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Holland Johnson on behalf of Blackberry Corporation. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Johnson, Mark)
January 10, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC (Nelson, Edward)
December 27, 2018 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Blackberry Corporation. (Pankratz, Kurt)
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 21 days of the date of this Order and report to the Court within 21 days after the conference. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/27/2018) (ykp)
December 26, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Johnson Kuncheria on behalf of Blackberry Corporation. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Kuncheria, Johnson)
December 26, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kurt M Pankratz on behalf of Blackberry Corporation. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Pankratz, Kurt)
December 26, 2018 Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss filed by Blackberry Corporation with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)Attorney Kurt M Pankratz added to party Blackberry Corporation(pty:dft) (Pankratz, Kurt) Modified text on 12/27/2018 (ala).
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David C Godbey for all further proceedings. Judge Ed Kinkeade no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 11/20/2018) (chmb)
November 19, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Blackberry Corporation. (ykp)
November 19, 2018 Filing 4 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (ykp)
November 19, 2018 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp)
November 19, 2018 Judge Ed Kinkeade added pursuant to Special Order 3-287. Judge Jane J. Boyle no longer assigned to case. (ewd)
November 17, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Uniloc 2017 LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate CF Uniloc Holdings LLC for Uniloc 2017 LLC. (ykp)
November 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Blackberry Corporation filed by Uniloc 2017 LLC. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-9592077) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A (U.S. Patent No. 7,167,487, #3 Certificate of Interested Persons) (Jacobs, Aaron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Blackberry Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Uniloc 2017 LLC
Represented By: Aaron Seth Jacobs
Represented By: Edward R Nelson, III
Represented By: Shawn A Latchford
Represented By: Kevin Gannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blackberry Corporation
Represented By: Kurt M Pankratz
Represented By: Mark Holland Johnson
Represented By: Johnson Kuncheria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?