Thomas v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| William Howard Thomas |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 3:2019cv00088 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:19-cv-88-B-BN consolidated with lead case 3:18-cv-3155-B-BT. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:18-cv-3155-B-BT. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 2/25/2019) (zkc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 6. Mon Feb 25 14:34:02 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Howard Thomas. (svc) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Thomas must complete the form petition, sign and date it, and return it to the Court. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 2/15/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 1/16/2019) (Attachments: #1 2254 form) (rekc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Jan 16 13:56:53 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Howard Thomas. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ala) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ala) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ala) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Jan 10 15:36:54 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Howard Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
