Coyne v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jonathan Coyne and Jonathan Paul Coyne
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 3:2019cv01126
Filed: May 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2019 Filing 10 Business Reply Card signed by USMS; re #8 Order, #7 Amended Complaint, #9 Summons Issued. Signed on 6/21/2019. (zkc)
June 20, 2019 Filing 9 Summons issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (svc)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue summons and deliver the summons and a copy of #7 the amended complaint in the case to the U.S. Marshal. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/20/2019) (chmb)
June 19, 2019 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Jonathan Paul Coyne. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (rekc) (Clerk's Note: Page 3 of attachment not received.)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Plaintiff Jonathan Coyne must address the following deficiency: The complaint was not filed on the appropriate form. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint on the form for seeking review of a social security decision by 6/21/2019. A form complaint for review of social security decision, Pro Se 13, is available online at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms. Further, a review of the docket reveals that Plaintiff has not yet registered as a user of the Court's electronic filing system, as required. In the event Plaintiff has not already done so, he is ORDERED to register for electronic filing through this Court's CM/ECF system, as required by Northern District of Texas Local Civil Rule 5.1(f), by 6/21/2019. Instructions for registering are found online at https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/AttorneyReg/.PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). No process will issue except upon order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 5/30/2019) (chmb)
May 10, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jonathan Coyne. (rekc)
May 10, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan Coyne (rekc)
May 10, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Jonathan Coyne. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (rekc)
May 10, 2019 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (rekc)
May 10, 2019 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc)
May 10, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri May 10 15:27:37 CDT 2019 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coyne v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Coyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Paul Coyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?