Spivey v. Absentia Pictures LLC et al
| Zachary M Spivey |
| Fox Hollow Features LLC, Absentia Pictures LLC, Diceman House Cinema LLC and Summer Hill Films LLC |
| 3:2019cv01256 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Strike #10 Answer to Complaint filed by Zachary M Spivey With Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Strike, #2 Proposed Order) (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Partial Settlement filed by Zachary M Spivey (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Absentia Pictures LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. If additional patent or trademark numbers are included, the clerk will prepare the appropriate Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (zkc) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Absentia Pictures LLC. (zkc) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Regarding Extension of Deadline to Answer by Zachary M Spivey. (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Absentia Pictures LLC ; served on 5/29/2019. (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Summer Hill Films LLC, served on 5/31/2019. (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Fox Hollow Features LLC, served on 5/29/2019. (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Report to Copyright Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 121 e-mailed to 508filings@loc.gov. (mla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Absentia Pictures LLC, Diceman House Cinema LLC, Fox Hollow Features LLC, Summer Hill Films LLC. (aaa) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Absentia Pictures LLC, Diceman House Cinema LLC, Fox Hollow Features LLC, Summer Hill Films LLC filed by Zachary M Spivey. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10010207) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (Lindstrom, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
