Geoshack Inc v. Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC
Plaintiff: Geoshack Inc
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC
Case Number: 3:2019cv01851
Filed: August 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Original Petition. Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC answer due 10/7/2019. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/29/2019) (zkc)
August 28, 2019 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time of Time to Answer or Otherwise, Respond to Plaintiff's Original Petition filed by Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hudson, Timothy)
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Geoshack Inc. (Mayer, Mark)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time of Time to Answer or Otherwise respond. Defendant shall electronically file its answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's original petition no later than 9/6/2019. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/8/2019) (aaa)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: No later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/8/2019) (aaa)
August 8, 2019 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time of Time to Answer or Otherwise, Respond to Plaintiff's Original Petition filed by Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hudson, Timothy)
August 2, 2019 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc)
August 2, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 95th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, case number DC-19-06668 filed by Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies, L.C.. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10162600) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A (Index of State Court Documents), #2 Exhibit(s) B (State Court Docket Sheet), #3 Exhibit(s) C (Plaintiff's Original Petition), #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H (Certificate of Interested Persons), #9 Exhibit(s) I (Civil Cover Sheet), #10 Exhibit(s) J (Supplemental Cover Sheet)) (Hudson, Timothy)
August 2, 2019 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Lockheed Martin Corporation for Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC. (Please see #1 for image.) (rekc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geoshack Inc v. Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies LC
Represented By: Timothy E Hudson
Represented By: Anna Kalinina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoshack Inc
Represented By: Mark A Mayer
Represented By: Virginia Hammerle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?