Taylor v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 3:2019cv01911
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor must address the following deficiency: The submitted request to proceed in forma pauperis provides insufficient information to determine whether in forma pauperis status is appropriate. Certificate of inmate trust account required. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor shall cure each aforementioned deficiency by October 11, 2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/11/2019) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (ndt) Modified on 9/12/2019 (mcrd).
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed Sep 11 15:01:13 CDT 2019 (crt)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Petitioner's Request for Production of Court Reporter's and Clerk's Record filed by Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor. (aaa)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor. (zkc)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (zkc)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (zkc)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 1, 2. Mon Aug 12 11:35:36 CDT 2019 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darron Antoine Dewayne Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?