Barta v. Young et al
James Randolph Barta |
Total Logistics, LLC, Joshua Dean Young and Total Logistics LLC |
3:2019cv02462 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
A Joe Fish |
Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of filing Initial Disclosures filed by Total Logistics LLC, Joshua Dean Young (Dyer, Mark) |
Filing 10 ORDER ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE AND CERTAIN PRETRIAL REQUIREMENTS : Amended Pleadings due by 2/11/2020. Discovery due by 7/31/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 2/11/2020. Motions due by 5/29/2020. Pretrial Materials due by 9/25/2020. Pretrial Order due by 9/25/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 10/2/2020 10:00 AM before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. Jury Trial set for 10/5/2020 before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/13/2019) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (ndt) Modified on 11/20/2019 (svc). |
Filing 9 First STATUS REPORT filed by James Randolph Barta. (Shamieh, Ramez) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Total Logistics LLC, Joshua Dean Young. (Geddie, Ryan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties filed by James Randolph Barta (Shamieh, Ramez) |
Filing 6 ORDER: No later than 20 days after this order is filed, the removing defendants must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/21/2019) (aaa) |
Filing 5 ORDER: No later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/21/2019) (aaa) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 11/12/2019. See order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/21/2019) (lag/chmb) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
Filing 2 Appendix in Support filed by Total Logistics, LLC, Joshua Dean Young re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Exhibit(s)) (Geddie, Ryan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 101st District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-19-13201 filed by Total Logistics, LLC, Joshua Dean Young. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10345487) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Geddie, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.