Mentesana v. Mentesana
| Wilford Pete Mentesana |
| Mary Katheriene Mentesana |
| 3:2020cv01933 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Aug 14 12:29:42 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 8
JUDGMENT - This action is DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/13/2020) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re #6 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/13/2020) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Aug 13 16:49:32 CDT 2020 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #3 Complaint. This action should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/28/2020) (oyh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Jul 28 16:14:47 CDT 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wilford Pete Mentesana. (jmg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wilford Pete Mentesana. (jmg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Mary Katheriene Mentesana filed by Wilford Pete Mentesana. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Jul 22 15:03:09 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mentesana v. Mentesana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mary Katheriene Mentesana | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wilford Pete Mentesana | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
