Sodhi v. Cuccinelli et al
Charandeep S Sodhi |
Kenneth T Cuccinelli and Gregory A Richardson |
3:2020cv02923 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Brantley Starr |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Gregory A Richardson. (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Gregory A Richardson with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) |
Filing 8 ORDER: The Court DENIES Sodhi's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The Court also DISMISSES AS MOOT Sodhi's Request for an Expedited Hearing on that motion, but DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to a hearing on his other claims. Sodhi may file his motion for summary judgment whenever he so chooses. Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Sodhi's request for an expedited summary judgment motion and briefing schedule at this time. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/28/2020) (oyh) |
Filing 7 REPLY filed by Charandeep S Sodhi re: #6 Response/Objection (Swaim, David) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE filed by Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Gregory A Richardson re: #1 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Request for Expedited Hearing. (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) Modified text on 10/16/2020 (axm). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Delaney-DOJ on behalf of Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Gregory A Richardson. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) |
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Gregory A Richardson, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (jmg) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Charandeep S Sodhi. (Swaim, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Review for Under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act, Plaintiff's motion for Preliminary Injunction and Plaintiff's Request for an Expedited Hearing against All Defendants filed by Charandeep S Sodhi. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11197176) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 7, #8 Exhibit(s) 8, #9 Exhibit(s) 9, #10 Exhibit(s) 10, #11 Cover Sheet, #12 Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Injunction) (Swaim, David) Modified text on 10/16/2020 (axm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.