Republic Technologies NA LLC et al v. Shahrukh & Shahzeb Inc
Republic Tobacco LP, Republic Technologies (NA), LLC and Republic Technologies NA LLC |
Shahrukh & Shahzeb, Inc. d/b/a Eagle Food Mart, Diamond Virani and Shahrukh & Shahzeb Inc doing business as Eagle Food Mart |
3:2020cv03061 |
October 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jane J Boyle |
A Joe Fish |
Property Rights: Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1121 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Shahrukh & Shahzeb Inc, Diamond Virani . (axm) Modified text on 12/2/2020 (ykp). |
Filing 14 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Republic Technologies NA LLC, Republic Tobacco LP. (Ticktin, Peter) |
Filing 13 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Republic Technologies NA LLC, Republic Tobacco LP. (Ticktin, Peter) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Republic Technologies NA LLC, Republic Tobacco LP. Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B) (Ticktin, Peter) |
Filing 11 Designation of Local Counsel Peter David Ticktin for Plaintiffs Republic Technologies NA LLC, Republic Tobacco LP. (Ticktin, Peter) Modified title on 11/16/2020 (mjr). |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #9 Motion to Waive Local Counsel Requirement or Alternatively Delay Enforcement of Local Counsel Requirement. Per Local Rule 83.10(a), written designation of local counsel must be filed within 14 days of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/26/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Waive Local Counsel Requirement or Alternatively Enforcement of Local Counsel Requirement filed by Republic Technologies NA LLC, Republic Tobacco LP (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion) (Ticktin, Peter) Modified event and text on 10/26/2020 (mjr). |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Republic Technologies NA LLC, Republic Tobacco LP. (Ticktin, Peter) |
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jane J. Boyle for all further proceedings. Senior Judge A. Joe Fish no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/7/2020) (axm) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Shahrukh & Shahzeb Inc. (jmg) |
Filing 5 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (jmg) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 6, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a complaint in this case but did not provide the clerk with a certificate of interested persons. N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 3.1(3) and 3.2(e) requires that "[w]hen a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with...a separately signed certificate of interested persons that contains a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary." Accordingly, no later than 20 days after this order is filed, plaintiffs must comply with Rule 3.1(3) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/6/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, within twenty days of this date, the plaintiffs shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/6/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shahrukh & Shahzeb, Inc. d/b/a Eagle Food Mart filed by Republic Technologies (NA), LLC, Republic Tobacco LP. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11240080) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B) (Ticktin, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.