Lonergan et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
Gaylene Rogers and John Lonergan |
US Bank National Association |
3:2020cv03091 |
October 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Karen Gren Scholer |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting the parties' #8 Joint Motion for Continuance to File Dismissal Papers. The parties must file their joint stipulation of dismissal, approved and signed by all counsel of record, on or before 12/14/2020. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/30/2020) (chmb) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Continue (for Continuance) to File Dismissal Papers filed by US Bank National Association (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The parties have advised the Court that they have settled this lawsuit. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint stipulation of dismissal, approved and signed by all counsel of record, no later than 11/30/2020. This case will be subject to dismissal without further notice, on terms set by the Court, if a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by the 11/30/2020 deadline. In view of this settlement, the FRCP 16 Scheduling Conference set for 10/28/2020 is CANCELLED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/21/2020) (Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of (Joint) Settlement, filed by US Bank National Association. (Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 5 ORDER: FRCP 16 Scheduling Conference via Zoom set for 10/28/2020 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/14/2020) (mjr) Modified hearing judge on 10/15/2020 (ali). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Philip William Danaher on behalf of US Bank National Association. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Danaher, Philip) |
Case Referred to Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford per Special Order 3-251. (ctf) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by U.S. Bank National Association, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A. (Cronenwett, Mark) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by U.S. Bank National Association, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-11252711) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet) (Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.