Jenkins v. Richardson Independent School District
Plaintiff: Antwanette Lavonne Jenkins
Defendant: Richardson Independent School District
Case Number: 3:2020cv03461
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Richardson Independent School District filed by Antwanette Lavonne Jenkins. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Gilmore, Jamie)
December 22, 2020 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Richardson Independent School District. (Long, Kathryn)
December 22, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Richardson Independent School District. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Long, Kathryn)
December 22, 2020 Filing 8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint or, Alternatively, Motion for a More Definitive Statement filed by Richardson Independent School District. Attorney Kathryn E Long added to party Richardson Independent School District(pty:dft) (Long, Kathryn)
December 21, 2020 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Partial Dismissal by Antwanette Lavonne Jenkins. (Gilmore, Jamie)
December 4, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Richardson Independent School District; served on 12/2/2020. (mjr)
November 23, 2020 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Antwanette Lavonne Jenkins. (Gilmore, Jamie)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The plaintiff has yet to provide the clerk with a certificate of interested persons. N.D. TEX. CIV. R. 3.1(c) and 3.2(e) requires that "[w]hen a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with... a separately signed certificate of interested persons that contains a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary." Accordingly, no later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/23/2020) (chmb)
November 23, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Richardson Independent School District. (jmg)
November 20, 2020 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg)
November 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Richardson Independent School District filed by Antwanette Lavonne Jenkins. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11376953) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Gilmore, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. Richardson Independent School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richardson Independent School District
Represented By: Joshua D Fuller
Represented By: Carlos G Lopez
Represented By: Kathryn E Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antwanette Lavonne Jenkins
Represented By: Jamie Jean Gilmore
Represented By: Brittney Lynne Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?