Cartwright v. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc et al
| Matthew Jacob Cartwright |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado LLC and Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc doing business as Chipotle Mexican Grill #112 |
| 3:2021cv00051 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/3/2021) (svc)
|
|
Filing 10
MEDIATION ORDER. The parties are to select or designate a mediator. #Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary form provided electronically or by US Mail as appropriate. Deadline for mediation is on or before 11/5/2021. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/3/2021) (svc)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this courts four-week docket beginning 6/6/2022 before Judge Sam A. Lindsay. Joinder of Parties due by 6/1/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 6/1/2021. Motions due by 1/18/2022. Discovery due by 1/3/2022. Pretrial Order due by 5/9/2022. Pretrial Materials due by 5/9/2022. Status Report due by 6/1/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 6/2/2022 01:30 PM before Judge Sam A. Lindsay. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/3/2021) (svc)
|
| Filing 8 Agreed MOTION for Entry of Confidentiality Agreement and Agreed Protective Order filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Confidentiality Agreement Agreed Protective ORDER) (Thompson, Peter) Modified text on 3/3/2021 (mjr). |
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Matthew Jacob Cartwright. (Kastl, Kristina) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Matthew Jacob Cartwright. (Kastl, Kristina) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Reilley, Steven) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND STATUS REPORT: Status Report due by 3/1/2021. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 1/28/2021) (svc)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc (Reilley, Steven) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11496006) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C) (Reilley, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
