Madero v. Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC
| Sebastian Madero |
| Susquehanna Salt Lake, LLC and Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC |
| 3:2021cv01365 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC. (Snyder, Mark) |
Filing 11
ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/2/2021) (axm)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,, filed by Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Snyder, Mark) |
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion to Extend Time. Defendant Susquehanna Salt Lake, LLCs response to the complaint is due August 2, 2021. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/12/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Mark Curtis Snyder added to party Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC(pty:dft) (Snyder, Mark) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC; served on 6/21/2021. (Manchee, James) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Motion for leave to proceed without local counsel. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 6/18/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Susquehanna Salt Lake LLC. (mjr) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION Leave to Appear Without Local Counsel filed by Sebastian Madero (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Manchee, James) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sebastian Madero. (Manchee, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Susquehanna Salt Lake, LLC filed by Sebastian Madero. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11968670) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet) (Manchee, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
