Anthony v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: James Deduan Anthony
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 3:2021cv01570
Filed: June 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Accepting #4 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Habeas corpus petition is successive, and the clerk is directed to transfer the matter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 8/11/2021) (ygl)
August 11, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Aug 11 14:00:24 CDT 2021 (crt)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court should transfer Petitioner James Deduan Anthony's successive application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for appropriate action. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/13/2021) (ygl) Modified text on 7/13/2021 (ygl).
July 13, 2021 ***DISREGARD Entered in Error***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Tue Jul 13 12:33:32 CDT 2021 (crt) Modified on 7/13/2021 (ygl).
July 13, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Jul 13 11:36:31 CDT 2021 (crt)
July 8, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Jul 8 10:27:33 CDT 2021 (crt)
June 29, 2021 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Deduan Anthony. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg)
June 29, 2021 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg)
June 29, 2021 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Deduan Anthony
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?