Segovia v. Kang et al
Rafael Segovia |
Hee Sook Kang and ick seh kang |
3:2021cv02565 |
October 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Karen Gren Scholer |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hee Sook Kang filed by Rafael Segovia. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Sapp, Matthew) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC Order Returning Case to District Judge. This case was referred to the magistrate judge for judicial screening. Having completed screening, the case is returned to the District Judge for further action as may be appropriate. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/21/2021) (chmb) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/21/2021) (jmg) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Rafael Segovia must address the following deficiency: Signature of the attorney of record or each party proceeding pro se is required on each pleading, motion or other paper filed by that party. Plaintiff(s) must submit a new and properly signed complaint. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 11/22/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/21/2021) (ygl) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford. (jmg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rafael Segovia. (See document #1 - 3 for image.) (jmg) |
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rafael Segovia. (See document #1 - 2 for image.) (jmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hee Sook Kang filed by Rafael Segovia. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Page(s), #3 Proposed Order, #4 Additional Page(s)) (Sapp, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.