Ramseur v. USA
Robert Earl Ramseur |
USA |
3:2021cv02934 |
November 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT: Therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk shall transmit to the parties a true copy of this Judgment and the Order adopting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/7/2022) (ndt) |
Filing 5 Order Accepting #3 Findings and Recommendations re: #2 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Robert Earl Ramseur. If Movant files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/7/2022) (ndt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Fri Jan 7 13:21:51 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION filed by Robert Earl Ramseur re: #3 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #2 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (mjr) |
Filing 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #2 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Court recommends this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 12/8/2021) (ykp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Wed Dec 8 15:45:42 CST 2021 (crt) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, Motion for Extension of Time to File, (Criminal Case Number 3:19-cr-65) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
Filing 1 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mla) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1. Mon Nov 22 15:06:55 CST 2021 (crt) |
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (mla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ramseur v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Robert Earl Ramseur | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.