Nikopoulos v. Dallas College
Plaintiff: Beth Nikopoulos
Defendant: Dallas College
Case Number: 3:2022cv01680
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ada Brown
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report Due Three (3) Weeks from the Date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 9/2/2022) (ygl)
August 31, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dallas College. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Higgins, Kristin)
August 31, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Dallas College. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Kristin Snyder Higgins added to party Dallas College (pty:dft) (Higgins, Kristin)
August 15, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Dallas College ; served on 8/11/2022. (Hill, Frank)
August 3, 2022 Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS (Cover Sheet) to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Beth Nikopoulos. (Hill, Frank) Modified on 8/4/2022 (ygl).
August 3, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Dallas College. (ygl)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Dallas College filed by Beth Nikopoulos. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-13005030) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Hill, Frank)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nikopoulos v. Dallas College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beth Nikopoulos
Represented By: Frank W Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dallas College
Represented By: Kristin Snyder Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?