Sosa v. Myers et al
| Thomas C Sosa, Jr |
| NFN Myers and John Doe (3:22-cv-2134) |
| 3:2022cv02134 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Judgment to the Fifth Circuit by Thomas C Sosa, Jr. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (axm) |
Filing 7
JUDGMENT: This civil action is DISMISSED as barred by the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/26/2022) (sxf)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ACCEPTING #4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/26/2022) (sxf)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Wed Oct 26 14:14:02 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 8 DUPLICATE OBJECTION to #4 Findings and Recommendations by Thomas C Sosa, Jr Signed 10/18/2022. (axm) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Findings and Recommendations by Thomas C Sosa, Jr signed 10/12/2022. (sxf) Modified on 10/27/2022 (axm). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Oct 4 09:59:49 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 4
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #2 Complaint. The Court should DISMISS this civil action as barred by the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Such dismissal is with prejudice to the refiling of an in forma pauperis complaint raising the same claims presented here, but without prejudice to the refiling of this complaint with full payment of the $402.00 filing fee. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/3/2022) (oyh)
|
| Filing 3 Certificate of Trust Account by Thomas C Sosa, Jr TDCJ # 02374326. (mla) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against John Doe (3:22-cv-2134), NFN Myers filed by Thomas C Sosa, Jr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (mla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
