Arvizu v. City of Dallas et al
| Cathy Cortina Arvizu |
| Paula Blackmon, Paul E Ridley, Tennell Atkins, Gay Donnell Willis, Adam Bazaldua, Zarin D. Gracey, Jaynie Schultz, Kathy Stewart, Jesse Moreno, Omar Narvaez, City of Dallas, Carolyn King Arnold, Jaime Resendez and Chad West |
| 3:2024cv02152 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated per #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (kaf) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by Cathy Cortina Arvizu (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Spears, Adrian) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time to File Entry of Appearance by Local Counsel and Apply for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The deadlines for compliance with Local Civile Rules 83.9(b) and 83.10(a) are extended to 9/26/2024. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 9/12/2024) (kcr)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to file entry of local counsel & pro hac vice filed by Cathy Cortina Arvizu (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Spears, Adrian) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER: It has come to the Court's attention that Plaintiff's Counsel Charles H. Sierra is not admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Therefore, within 20 days from the date of this order, counsel for Plaintiff must either become admitted to practice in this District (See LR 83.7), or move the Court to be admitted Pro Hac Vice (See LR 83.9(b)). Failure to do so may result in sanctions being imposed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 8/23/2024) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Civil Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where the attorney of record for a party does not reside or maintain their principal office in this district. Within twenty-one days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Civil Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in sanctions being imposed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 8/23/2024) (chmb)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by CATHY CORTINA ARVIZU. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14861040) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet) (Spears, Adrian) (Attachment 2 flattened on 8/22/2024) (kcr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
