Gore v. AT&T Inc et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Gore
Defendant: AT&T Inc and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 3:2025cv00317
Filed: February 10, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ada Brown
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On April 22, 2024, the Court consolidated numerous cases into the Petroski Action (3:24-cv-0757-E) and re-captioned the case to In Re: AT&T Data Breach Litigation. On June 5, 2024, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, created the IN RE: AT&T CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION in MDL No. 3114. Under 28 U.S.C. 1407, the litigation was centralized in the Northern District of Texas, and the case was assigned to Honorable U.S. District Judge Ada E. Brown for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The case was assigned number 3:24-md-3114-E in the Northern District of Texas. Since the creation of MDL No. 3114, there have been numerous cases directly filed in the Northern District of Texas, and tag-a-long cases (cases filed in other U.S. District Courts), transferred to the MDL in the Northern District of Texas by way of a Finalized Conditional Transfer Order. Because these cases are putative class actions, the Court believes that consolidation is appropriate, and therefore, all cases filed directly in the Northern District of Texas and tag-a-long cases are hereby consolidated into 3:24-cv-0757-E, for consolidated pretrial proceedings. Upon entry of this Order in each case, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close the remaining related Direct filed and Tag-A-Long cases. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:24-cv-00757. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 2/10/2025) (twd)
February 10, 2025 Filing 16 Case electronically transferred in from District of California Southern; Case Number 3:24-cv-01885. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.
February 7, 2025 Filing 15 Case transferred to District of Texas Northern District Court. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Texas Northern District Court*.*1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452**Dallas, TX 752421310* (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order, MDL 3114) (jmo) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
February 6, 2025 Filing 14 STATUS REPORT by AT&T, Inc. (Cutts, Kyle) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
December 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Joint Motion for Stay of Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 12/16/2024. (sjt) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
December 16, 2024 Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay by AT&T, Inc.. (Cutts, Kyle) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
November 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE, re #8 Notice of Related Case. Case reassigned to Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit for all further proceedings. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, Magistrate Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:24-cv-01188-TWR-MMP. The new case number is 24cv1885-TWR-MMP. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 11/19/2024. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 11/14/2024.(sjt) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
November 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. AT&T, Inc. answer due 12/23/2024. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 11/19/2024. (maq) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
November 19, 2024 Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by AT&T, Inc. (Cutts, Kyle) (maq). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
November 14, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) of case(s) 24cv1188-TWR-MMP. (sjt) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Granting Joint Motion For Extension Of Deadline For Defendant To Respond To Plaintiffs Complaint re (ECF #5 ). AT&T, Inc. Response due by 11/22/2024. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/23/2024. (mef) (jms). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE, re #4 Notice of Related Case. Case reassigned to Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks for all further proceedings. Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw, Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:24-cv-01282-AJB-BJC. The new case number is 24cv1885-AJB-BJC. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 10/21/2024. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/18/2024.(ddf) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 21, 2024 Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by AT&T, Inc.. (Cutts, Kyle) (ddf). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 16, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by AT&T, Inc. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cutts, Kyle) (ddf). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 16, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by AT&T, Inc. (Cutts, Kyle) (ddf). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 16, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AT&T, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Cutts, Kyle) (ddf). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]
October 16, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-19271913.), filed by AT&T, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Docket)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1885-DMS-MMP. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case.(axc1) (jms). [Transferred from California Southern on 2/10/2025.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gore v. AT&T Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Gore
Represented By: Jeremy S Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Inc
Represented By: Kyle Thomas Cutts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?