Evans v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Patrick Evans
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:
4:2013cv00301
Filed:
April 10, 2013
Court:
Texas Northern District Court
Office:
Fort Worth Office
County:
Anderson
Referring Judge:
Jeffrey L Cureton
Presiding Judge:
John McBryde
Nature of Suit:
Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
January 5, 2015 | 27 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Evans v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID | |
Represented By: | Nathan Tadema |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Patrick Evans | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.