Hummel v. Stephens
||Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
||February 4, 2017
||US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
||Fort Worth Office
||Reed C. O'Connor
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 3, 2018
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Because Petitioner is not entitled to relief on any of his AEDPA claims, the Court DENIES his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 12). In accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S .C. § 2253(c), and after considering the record in this case, the Court DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Mill er-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 33638 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 48384 (2000). If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)(7). It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/3/2018) (trt)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?